demnsionamento In the case of disqualification or professional recognition of the worker's right to compensation professional, biological or existential, is not satisfied automatically in all cases of failure of the employers; if you are unable to demonstrate the nature and characteristics of the injury, you can get a presumption of the opposite sign to the demotion by the extreme modesty of activity previously limited supremacy. It 'as stated by the Supreme Court that the sentence no 5237 of 4 March 2011, dismissed an appeal by a worker against the decision of the trial court that had rejected the application seeking to obtain compensation for the damage by failing to provide evidence of the worker injury demotion, and considering the extreme modesty of former position of supremacy over their colleagues. The Supreme Court stressed that the Court of Appeal was right in line with the legal principle according to which the worker's entitlement to compensation professional, biological or existential resulting from demotion or demotion is not possible without a specific allegation in the application instituting the proceedings, the nature and characteristics of the injury itself. Stoats also agree that a modest and limited control position of the worker in respect of his colleagues, as in perspective, could not have exceeded the tolerance threshold beyond which the substance to the non-pecuniary damage.
http://www.studiocataldi.it/news_giuridiche_asp/news_giuridica_9864.asp
0 comments:
Post a Comment