There is 'reading' that takes judicial, 'crack' console is a crime, and as such should be punito.A determine this, finally putting the dots on 'i', the Third Criminal Court of Cassation (8791/11 , filed last Friday) that returning to the protection of copyright applied to new technologies, with court cancels an order 'liberistaì' Review of Florence, fully confirming the two previous case law (23765/10 and 33768/07).
The issue concerns an incident that happened last summer, when a forty year old Tuscan had suffered a search and seizure of computer hardware, having advertised sold on the internet and programs to get around the block the installation of non-original games on Nintendo platforms.
courts had held that the defense advanced technology by the manufacturer - in addition to the programs 'Tarot' to their console, but also blocks the original software for other areas of business - it was basically 'too much' and that the hardware would be out of 'area of \u200b\u200bprotection of the law 633/41.
Now, the Supreme Court returned the case, citing the Court of Review, guilty of having ignored the ruling that broadened the umbrella 23765/10 penalty (Article 171-ter, paragraph 1 letter f-bis of Law 633/41 ) to "all devices primarily designed to allow the circumvention of technological protection measures appearing on materials and works protected by copyright, do not require their direct apposition incriminating rule over the works or materials protected. "
In practice, though the console is definitely a hardware, but it is essential to run the original software, so that any tampering with it in fact undermines the protection of the same programs.
Finally, according to the judges of the Court, in this way also avoids the copyright law (Article 171-bis c.1 f) meeting inevitably going to penalties.
http://www.giocoegiochi.com/index.php?id=56478
0 comments:
Post a Comment