The mother-in-law resumes assigned to house ex-law and grandchildren
Se la suocera ne ha bisogno la nuora deve restituire la casa concessa in comodato gratuito agli sposi. L'immobile va lasciato anche se, dopo la separazione, il giudice lo ha assegnato alla moglie come genitore affidatario. Con la sentenza 4917 del 28 febbraio la Cassazione ha decretato la restituzione di un appartamento alla mamma dello sposo, (comproprietario di 1/9 dell'immobile) che, certificati medici alla mano, ha provato il suo stato di necessità . Oltre a documentare le precarie condizioni di salute la signora aveva mostrato ai giudici la lettera con cui uno dei suoi figli le comunicava la sua intenzione di non volerla più ospitare. Una causa non prevedibile che, unita allo stato di urgente bisogno, ha indotto la Corte of Appeals and the Supreme Court to decide in favor of the elderly, despite the existence of the court order granting the former wife accommodation. An act which has occurred after the separation, which - makes clear the Supreme Court - can not be opposed to the mother-in-law, who was on loan because the property was used as a family house, if it needs them for urgent and could not be anticipated. Neither the judges of Piazza Cavour gave weight to the argument of costs incurred to settle the property, which it sought reimbursement. Interventions, supported by her former husband, "consistent with the ordinary use of the property that is for the borrower and the position of co-owner." According to the lawyers association
double the ruling would open the way for an avalanche of appeals because it upsets a deep-seated orientation. In fact, however, the Supreme Court in the past followed the same approach with other judgments (among them the No. 13603 of July 21, 2004 and No. 9253 of May 4, 2005).
JUDGEMENT
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/norme-e-tributi/2011-03-01/suocera-riprende-casa-assegnata-100647.shtml?uuid=AaPVuWCD
0 comments:
Post a Comment